Monday, 31 October 2011

More on Sidewalk Snow Clearing

Kearney councillors Barry Dingwall and Steve Sainsbury live in Barrie.

The City of Barrie clears their sidewalks.



Kearney Deputy Mayor Art Murdy lives in Sudbury.

The City of Sudbury clears his sidewalks.



Kearney councillor Louise Wadsworth and Mayor Paul Tomlinson live in Proudfoot.

There are no sidewalks in Proudfoot.



Kearney councillors Ken Ball and Yvonne Wills actually live in Kearney! 

But do not have sidewalks.




See now why Council doesn't give a rat's ass if a few stupid Townies have to clear their own sidewalks?

Are you surprised?


Council's Latest Trick

Since the new council took office last year, council meetings have been held at 7PM on Friday nights so, according to Mayor Paul Tomlinson, cottagers and working townsfolk can easily attend:

"[Weekend meetings] was a big issue that was in my campaign platform and we heard from the public, in no uncertain terms, if we are to [be] open and transparent Wednesday afternoon at 1 pm does not allow residents of Kearney to attend the council meetings."
And attendance didn't increase one iota.

At least not because of the new and improved day and time. Attendance has only increased recently because of huge delegations of pissed off residents trying (unsuccessfully) to get council to do something for the Town instead of themselves for a change. "You want Council to apply for provincial/federal grant money for road improvements the Town won't fund? We've got better things to do. Next!"

Now, Mayor Tomlinson and council are backing away from their commitment to greater accessibility and starting the meetings at 6PM, but still advertising on the Town's website that meetings start at 7. So anyone hoping to attend the Question Period will discover they've arrived an hour too late. "Gosh, Council would have loved to have answered your questions about the current mess the town is in, but you came too late. Next!"

And even if people know that meetings really start at 6PM, does Tomlinson really expect that 9-to-5ers and cottagers are going to be able to get there in time? Apparently, Tomlinson doesn't really care all that much "allowing residents of Kearney to attend council meetings" after all. At least not the Question Period part, eh Paul?

Are you surprised?

From the Town of Kearney website, today.

From the minutes of the October 28th Council Meeting

Sunday, 30 October 2011

Another Voice Heard

Barrie resident, and sometimes Kearney councillor, Barry Dingwall once described his critics to the newspapers as "a small group of small-minded people". While he still might want to argue that we're "small-minded", he has to admit that the not-so-small number of critics is growing steadily.

The most recent voice of reason comes from Kearney resident Edward Dorion who wrote this Letter to the Editor of the Almaguin News.

Are you surprised?

Friday, 28 October 2011

Council Replaces Rink Attendant with Porta-Potties

Well, you won't have to pee in the bushes, unless you're disabled. The town has installed its portable toilets for skaters this winter now that the lack of a rink attendant will prevent our use of the indoor toilets. Unfortunately, the portable toilets are not wheelchair accessible, so the disabled will have wheel up the road to one of the businesses on Main Street. Hopefully, no one on Main Street went out for the day and the route is clear of ice and snow. (And we know the disabled don't skate, Paul. But they might want to bring their children and grandchildren to the rink.)

But even if you can use the portable toilet, will it be stocked with toilet paper? Where will we wash our hands? (Alcohol hand-rub is not a substitute for handwashing and you can bet it won't be heated.) Is there a change-table for infants? Lights? Hopefully, Who knows, Tough luck, and you probably don't want to see anyway!

Kearney's Lions Club worked hard and raised all the funds through the generosity of the good people of Kearney to build the park pavilion and its washrooms. Didn't cost a single tax-dollar. Previous councils, through good fiscal management and community spirit, provided a part-time rink attendant so that families could enjoy the rink to its fullest. 

But Mayor Paul Tomlinson promised his masters a 9.5% decrease in their municipal property taxes to offset the MPAC increase of 9.5% on their Proudfoot lakefront properties. Then he pissed off every other mayor and reeve within a 100 miles, forcing the town to hire a full-time CBO instead of sharing a CBO with other municipalities, as did every other council before him.

It just goes on and on.

Are you surprised?

Thursday, 27 October 2011

Kearney can afford a full-time CBO, but not a rink attendant

We hope skaters don't mind peeing in the bushes this winter. Mayor Paul Tomlinson and his three minions have axed the part-time Rink Attendant job at the Lion's Park skating rink. No attendant, no public washrooms. 

Last year, the attendant did a great job helping young children learn to skate and making sure that older kids didn't get too rambunctious around the younger ones. All the while keeping the washrooms neat and clean, the garbages emptied, and the ice maintained. Not that Proudfooters ever use that stupid Townie rink anyway.


Are you surprised?

Another Good Point

The sidewalk clearing issue seems to have struck a cord with many concerned citizens of Kearney. Another wrote in with this excellent point and a great suggestion:

"The current Council can afford to hire a full-time CBO [It was always a part-time position under previous councils], so why not let Henry Hess earn his $100,000-plus a year and get HIM to shovel the sidewalks? Or, if he's too busy wallpapering the town with tickets and bureaucratic red-tape, or running new businesses out of town, maybe Council can hire someone. They certainly act as though there's money to burn. Like the overtime they spend on town staff for weekend meetings that no cottagers ever attend. Or the money they WILL spend [again] if someone slips on ice because some little old lady's pension check couldn't cover the cost of having rock salt delivered with her groceries. A**holes."

Will Mayor Paul Tomlinson, or any of the other Proudfoot Four (Councillors Steve Sainsbury, Barry Dingwall, and Louise Wadsworth) step up and declare they were wrong? Never. Tomlinson has never admitted to being wrong about anything and in the end he'll just continue to whine about how he's "just one voice" and how it's everyone else's fault. As for the other three boot-licks? Well, we all know whose drum they march to. And, of course, Tomlinson would never have Henry Hess out shovelling snow when he could be out ticketing the crap out of the townsfolk or chasing off new business (unless they're planning to do business in Proudfoot). No sidewalks in Proudfoot...

Are you surprised?

Tuesday, 25 October 2011

Consider This:

A concerned citizen wrote us with some additional thoughts on the Sidewalk Snow Clearing bylaw issue.


Scenario 1:

An owner or tenant of a property, worried about being fined, is outside in the middle of a winter storm, furiously shovelling snow and chopping ice on the sidewalk.

He or she would certainly not be doing this miserable job (which the Town is responsible for under provincial law) were it not for the bylaw and the ever-circling Henry Hess. What happens if the homeowner or tenant is injured? He or she may suffer a disabling back injury or a heart attack from lifting the heavy snow. Would the Town be liable?

If so...


Scenario 2:

An owner or tenant of a property throws out his back while carrying firewood. In agony, he or she grabs a snow-shovel and stumbles out front to collapse on the sidewalk, where they wait for Mayor Tomlinson to show up with his chequebook.

Thursday, 20 October 2011

Tomlinson's Winter Cash Cow

This week's Almaguin News ran an article on Kearney's new by-law that requires citizens to clear the sidewalk adjacent to their properties. Like the roads, sidewalks are municipal property, but no one expects residents to clear the roads in front of their properties. But Mayor Paul Tomlinson is already counting the bucks that By-law Enforcement Officer (and sometimes CBO) Henry Hess will be able to pull in when Townies are away and can't shovel the snow off municipal property.

And as usual, Tomlinson doesn't care that in 2000 the Ontario Court of Appeals ruled that sidewalk clearing is the municipality's job regardless of by-laws or fines:
“snow and ice accumulating on public sidewalks . . . are the legal responsibility of the municipality, not the property owner.”
Councillor Barry Dingwall - who doesn't live in Kearney and probably won't be seen much after he closes his cottage -  whines:
“It originally came to us based on some concern by the senior citizens’ club and that’s why we took some action on it and put a bylaw in place. But since that time many of the people who were supposed to be people who were demanding this have come forward and said they would prefer that this bylaw didn’t exist.”
Kearney Dogsled Races 2012
Well duh, Barry. The by-law discriminates against the elderly (and disabled) who would be forced to hire someone to chop ice and shovel snow from their share of the sidewalk, or struggle to do it themselves if their fixed-incomes can't bear the cost. The elderly who asked the Town to keep the sidewalks cleared didn't expect the Town to pass a by-law making them do it! All because (according to Tomlinson) the big, burly men at the Public Works Department can't figure out how to shovel around a lamp post.

Not that the Proudfoot Four or their Fat-Cat buddies care one way or the other. Tomlinson and Wadsworth need every cent they can shake out of Kearney and its citizens to get that 9.5% for the ruling-class in Proudfoot; Everything else is our tough luck.

Mayor Tomlinson caps off his interview with the Almaguin News by saying that a new sidewalk plow would cost about $100,000. Sure, if you're planning to plow the sidewalks with a Ferrari. The truth of the matter is that a used machine can be purchased from a reputable dealer for a fraction of that (around 10 to 15 thousand), which would be fine given that Kearney has a relatively short run of sidewalk.

But with Mayor Tomlinson it's never about solutions. It's always about why it can't be done: There's a stupid lamp post in the way, stupid snow shovels cost millions of dollars, I'm just one voice. Or who's to blame: The stupid previous council put the lamp post in the wrong place, the stupid seniors won't shovel the town's sidewalks, the stupid taxpayers don't want to pay taxes, I'm just one voice.

Are you surprised?



Footnote: It's since been confirmed with the original engineering firm that the lampposts are exactly where they were supposed to placed per the plans. Nice try, Paul.

Sunday, 16 October 2011

The Hole Just Gets Deeper


Remember how Mayor Paul Tomlinson and Councillor Louise Wadsworth reduced the 2011 tax rate by 9.5% to offset the 9.5% increase in Proudfoot waterfront property taxes? As you may recall, Tomlinson and Wadsworth had to take money out of town's Reserves and forced a 5% reduction in departmental budgets. Then, when it was discovered that there was a huge surplus from 2010 (thanks to the previous council), this money was rolled into the 2011 Budget as "Working Capital".

This sounds a little complicated but basically it means that Tomlinson and Wadsworth skinned the 2011 Budget to the bone. They are not getting the revenues they expected and the departments can't meet the 5% reduction. That budget that Tomlinson had promised to deliver in 60 days (it actually took him more than 3 months) is a FAIL.

So, they have already sacrificed our town's future by taking from Reserves. Now the surplus the previous council gained last year, which should go into the Reserves, is being used up as so-called 'Working Capital'. 

Think of it like this:

In 2010 you worked extra hard and saved a lot of money (for home repairs, a new furnace, your kid's education, etc.). But then in 2011, you decide to put your feet up and not to work at all and just use your 2010 savings to pay the bills. Hey, the bills are getting paid, so what's the big deal, right? And if your spouse asks you if your spending your kid's college fund, you say, "No, honey! It's 'Working Capital'". 

Welcome to Kearney.

We are still 3 months away from the end of the year and the town's out of money, so stay tuned. It will be interesting to see how Tomlinson wiggles out of this one. Or who he blames for this monumental screw-up.

Are You Surprised? 

Tuesday, 30 August 2011

Tomlinson Admits He's No Leader

"I'm only one voice, y'know!"
On August 27th, Mayor Paul Tomlinson concluded the Town Hall meeting by washing his hands of any leadership and responsibility as mayor of Kearney. Tomlinson claims that he is but one voice out of seven at the council table and takes no responsibility for any of the council's decisions. If the public don't like the way the town is being run, they should blame council, not him.

So why did you become mayor, Paul? So you could strut around wearing the Chain of Office to impress your UK visitors and nothing more? Did you not realize that the mayor is Head of Council and is supposed to be a community leader? All the glory without the guts, eh?

And funny how you claim that as mayor you have no power, yet last term you repeatedly, and publicly, declared that Mayor Johnston was a "dictator". So are you lying now when you say you, as mayor have no power over council, or were you lying last term when you kept calling Mayor Johnston a dictator? Wasn't Mayor Johnston just one voice of seven?

So, which one is the lie, Paul?

Wednesday, 24 August 2011

Applying for a Building Permit, Proudfoot-Style

Hot on the heels of our last article, "Tim Brown is Back... Again... For the Fourth Time", a reader sent us a copy of the Town of Kearney's guide to applying for a building permit. The guide lists the various things you must have when applying for a permit, including the site plan, which is to be reviewed and approved by the Chief Building Officer. There's nothing in the guide about coming to council as a delegation to get your site plan approved by your buddies.

What should happen is this: Brown files his site plan with the town, and staff (including the CBO) review it and makes a recommendation to council. If the site plan is overly complex or controversial, then council should seek public input through a public hearing. Having someone address property development through "delegations" to council is not the proper process.

So why is Mayor Paul Tomlinson illegally avoiding proper procedure... Again?


Footnote: This abuse of process has also had another side-effect; Because there are only three "delegations" allowed per council meeting, many legitimate concerns are not being brought to council. As long as Mayor Tomlinson keeps clogging the meetings with his friends (Tim Brown and Jim Skelton this Friday), other legitimate groups are forced to wait months to be heard. Not that Tomlinson gives a rat's ass about anyone but himself and his buddies.

Are You Surprised?


Tim Brown is Back... Again... For the Fourth Time

Remember Tim Brown, Dingwall and Sainsbury's campaign manager and fund-raiser? We first introduced him here and spoke about him again here.

Well this Friday (August 26th), Tim will be back before council as a "delegation" to get the Proudfoot Four's approval on his revised site-plan for 4290 Chetwynd Road.

Must be nice to not have to file this stuff with the Chief Building Officer like everyone else. Heck, if this has to be dealt with at a council meeting, he should at least be on the agenda under "Public Hearings". A public hearing allows council and the public to ask the petitioner questions and express any concerns they might have. But Brown and the Proudfoot Four don't want questions asked or opinions expressed, so they've scheduled him as a "delegation" (for the FOURTH time). Under council meeting rules, the public and members of council are not allowed to ask questions (except for clarification) or express opinions. Convenient, huh? Do you think the Proudfoot Four will allow everyone who is applying for a building permit or building plan changes to come to council as a "delegation" and by-pass the CBO and the regular permit process? 

Yah, right...

Proudfooters: Get council, which is controlled by the Proudfoot Four, to approve your building plans.

Townies: Get stuck with CBO Henry Hess who will declare your permits invalid and your building inspector unqualified so Tomlinson can make up the budget short-fall on your backs.

Are You Surprised?

Tomlinson is at it again

We didn't really expect Mayor Paul Tomlinson to defer to us; That was just a bit of fun on our part.

So it's no surprise that this just popped up on the Town of Kearney website:



But there's a couple of problems with this announcement:

First: It says "CALLED BY THE COUNCIL". Council cannot (legally) call a meeting without a resolution first being passed at a prior council meeting. The mayor is the only one with the authority to call a Special Council Meeting otherwise. So this is yet another illegal meeting or Mayor Tomlinson is trying hide the fact that he called it.

Second: Tomlinson's campaign included changing the meeting times to Friday nights to make them more accessible to cottagers and working locals. But this meeting is at 8:30 AM. Like the last illegal meeting, it looks like Tomlinson is trying his best to discourage the public from attending.

Third: Why schedule a Special Council Meeting in order to hold a closed session when there's a regular council meeting that evening at 7:00 PM? Just have the closed session during that meeting and save the taxpayers $350.00 in honoraria for the morning meeting. Maybe they could donate the $350.00 to the Food Bank instead.

So it's back to the Ombudsman's Office.

Or is it?

After getting their wrists slapped by the Ombudsman's Office, the Proudfoot Four are planning to table a motion at the regular council meeting at 7:00 PM that would allow them to hire a private "Ombudsman" (at the Kearney taxpayers' expense). So instead of having their shenanigans investigated by an objective (and free) provincial Ombudsman, they're going to buy... er... hire their own. 

So there's no money for the Food Bank, but lots to spend on thwarting the efforts of those who try to bring justice to Kearney.

Are You Surprised?





Saturday, 20 August 2011

Council Defers To Concerned Citizens

After the Concerned Citizens of Kearney published an article on August 18th about the illegalities of the council meeting scheduled for Friday the 19th, Mayor Paul Tomlinson cancelled the meeting.

Just doing our civic duty, Paul. You're welcome!

Good News!

Remember when we reported that council will be implementing a 9% municipal tax decrease to offset the 9% provincial property tax increase for the property owners in Proudfoot, and how this would necessitate drawing on reserve funds and bankrupting the town?

Well, good news!

Chief Building Officer Henry Hess, who's already been raking in the cash with his ridiculous building permit "violations", is now the By-Law Enforcement Officer. So now our full-time CBO will have to put in at least 20 hours a week to earn his 40 hours of pay! And Evil Prince Paul has given the Wicked Sheriff of Kearney the thumbs up to ticket and permit the crap out of everything that moves and bring in those big bucks. Except up around Grass and Loon Lake, Henry. Paul has already personally checked those properties and everything there is just tickety-boo (wink, wink)!

So mow your lawn, pull those weeds, clean out that septic tank, hide the dog, tell the kids to keep "the damn noise down", and dust off an old Vote Tomlinson sign to "accidentally" leave leaning against the front porch, cause there's a new sheriff in town.


Resistance is Futile

Friday, 19 August 2011

What Goes Around, Comes Around... As If Tomlinson Cares

During the last term of council, then Councillor Paul Tomlinson and his Proudfoot cronies ran crying to the Ombudsman's Office at every opportunity demanding openness and transparency from Mayor Johnston and council. Fast forward to August 5th, 2011 and Mayor Tomlinson has to read out to the public a letter from that same Ombudsman's Office chastising him for 2 breaches; One breach of town by-laws, and one breach of the Municipal Act.

Tomlinson scoffed at the Ombudsman's findings saying it was "much to do about nothing". But Tomlinson's new-found disdain for the Ombudsman, by-laws, and the Municipal Act didn't stop there. This week Tomlinson called a "Special Council Meeting" without specifying the reason, which is a violation of Kearney's by-laws. And this "Special Meeting" will include a "closed session". But Tomlinson's not telling the public the reason for the closed session, which is a violation of the Municipal Act and the very thing the Ombudsman just finished chastising him for.

But Tomlinson doesn't give a rat's ass about the Ombudsman. He doesn't want the public coming out to this meeting and he's trying to advertise the meeting like there will be nothing to see, even though council will have to start the "open session" by explaining the reason for the "closed session" and then report again in an "open session" once the "closed session" has completed. 

And so the Ombudsman's Office will issue another admonishment and the Almaguin News will implore us all to just "Gee Whiz! Give them a chance, will ya!", 'cause Tomlinson's only been a member of council for the last five years and is still figuring things out, right?

Tomlinson and his Proudfoot cronies have been running slipshod over the rules, regulations, and the law since taking over council. And they're doing it with virtual impunity because the Ombudsman's Office is really all bark and no bite. They'll investigate this latest breach and write another polite letter, but in the end The Proudfoot Four will continue to do as they please and the people of Kearney will grumble behind closed curtains and do nothing.


Are You Surprised?

Wednesday, 3 August 2011

Would You Like A Second Opinion?

So few people want to incur the wrath of Mayor Paul Tomlinson or the other members of the Proudfoot Four, for fear they would suffer repercussions, that the Concerned Citizens of Kearney often stands out as a lone voice, at least publicly. And because we are just one voice, it's easy to dismiss us as a minority, or a bunch of cranks.

But with increasing frequency we are seeing the main-stream media reporting on issues very similar to ours.

Back in October 2010, Paul Tomlinson set the tone for the next four years in his negative and ungracious statements as he bragged to the press how he "built his electoral success by sowing and nurturing the seeds of anger amongst seasonal residents". Even the editors of the Almaguin News were disgusted that he pitted Kearney residents against Proudfoot residents and said so in this article.

Then in March 2011, the Proudfoot Four were making the papers when this article appeared about Dingwall's motion to council, divvying up the community events so the Proudfoot Four wouldn't have to rub elbows with the Kearney Townies all the time. Dingwall also managed to be blasphemous, insult Kearney's war vets, and make it perfectly clear that he ran for the job "to be a councillor, not to be a social butterfly". We did notice that he showed up for Regatta, but spent all his time sulking in his lawn chair (except for the 5 minutes he spent spying on the Chalk Art contest for Tomlinson).

Then there was the article on the Town of Kearney hiring a full-time Chief Building Officer (to replace the part-time CBO they lost when they dissed Perry Township) who "comes in a couple of times a week". Nice gig for a guy who was fired from his position as Magnetawan's CBO. Triple pay for a Magnetawan reject who shows up twice a week. More Proudfoot economics in action.


And on July 28th, the Almaguin News ran this article and this article on the bureaucratic mess the Proudfoot Four have created in Kearney (but not in Proudfoot where you get your zoning fees waived) and the nightmare it's creating for small business investors in Kearney (but not in Proudfoot where developers/campaign managers get to build all over the place without environmental, water, or sewage surveys and self-proclaimed tree-hugger Louise Wadsworth won't say "boo").
 
So are we really "a small bunch of small-minded people" as Councillor Barry Dingwall would have the newspapers believe? Or are we just the most vocal (as is the Almaguin News) of a much larger group? Either way, at least we're not trying to %@*! our neighbours.

Sunday, 31 July 2011

Tomlinson and Dingwall Find "Blind-Judging" Workaround?

When Mayor Paul Tomlinson and his wife Joan were selected to judge the children's sidewalk chalk art contest on Saturday several citizens complained that Tomlinson is well known for playing favourites and would likely judge against children of those who don't tow the Proudfoot line. So it was decided that the judges would stay away from competition and judge the artwork without knowing the identities of the artists.

But while the artists were still working on their pieces, Councillor Barry Dingwall, who hadn't moved from his spot next to the rock-climbing wall all day, went over, watched the artists for about 5 minutes, then returned to his seat where he entered into discussions with Tomlinson.

An innocent coincidence? Maybe. But the Proudfoot Four are not known for playing by the rules and why would Dingwall choose that event alone to take note of, and no other?

Are you surprised?

Friday, 29 July 2011

Mayor Paul Tomlinson loves the Volunteers!


Or does he?

On July 23rd, after much pushing and prodding, Mayor Tomlinson finally hosted a Volunteer Appreciation dinner for a group of about 150 attendees, which sounds noble…

BUT, instead of volunteering their own time and effort, the Proudfoot Four (Mayor Tomlinson, and Councillors Sainsbury, Dingwall, and Wadsworth) had the event catered to the tune of $3,500 of taxpayers' money. In past years, members of town council (and often their families) would roll up their sleeves and really show their appreciation by themselves volunteering. This year, Tomlinson had to do something to woo back the volunteers he’s been treating like dirt since getting elected, but the Proudfoot Four would never lower themselves to serving anyone who is clearly beneath their station, so they simply threw a lot of taxpayer money at it.

BUT, the dinner was by invitation only and a huge number of volunteers were snubbed.

BUT, Proudfoot property owners association members (GLLRG and SLAPOA) all received invitations. Maybe because they volunteered (wink, wink) to raise funds and campaign for the Proudfoot Four?

BUT, here’s the real hypocrisy:

At the July 15th Council meeting, Councillors Dingbury & Sainswall tabled a motion to deny the Burk's Falls Food Bank any further donations from the Town of Kearney. Nice. You guys are all heart. There are dozens of families in Kearney who use the Food Bank to make ends meet. These same families struggle to pay their property taxes, which Mayor Tomlinson had no qualms in using to host a dinner where all his fat-cat Proudfoot buddies could belly up to the buffet table for a free feed.

Wine and dine your buddies, waive rezoning fees for your campaign manager, but let those icky Townies go hungry.

Are you surprised?

Tuesday, 12 July 2011

You are Cordially Invited to Tim Brown's Pity-Party

In the July 7th edition of the Almaguin News (page 3), Kearney Councillor Steve Sainsbury and his conjoined twin Councillor Barry Dingwall do a pretty good Proudfoot Sidestep as they whine about how their campaign manager Tim Brown has been treated by us and others who took exception to the shenanigans at the council meeting of March 11, 2011. You can read the original story here.

Sainswall and Dingbury are trying to get the public to come out to their pity-party for Tim Brown, who they claim has had his reputation "attacked".

But if Tim Brown's reputation is suffering, let's look at the facts:

  • Tim Brown didn't petition council in person. Instead he recruited a local to do it for him.
  • Tim Brown also petitioned using the name of his "company" Ethical Wealth Corporation. If you Google "Ethical Wealth Corporation" you'll get ZERO hits outside this blog.

Two layers of concealment, but no smoking gun so far. But...

  • Mayor Paul Tomlinson had to be asked more than once before he admitted that the petition was Tim Brown's. And it was blatantly obvious that Tomlinson didn't want to come clean.
  • Tim Brown is/was a member of the Grass and Loon Lakes Residents' Group (GLLRG), as are/were Mayor Paul Tomlinson, Councillor Dingwall and Councillor Sainsbury.
  • Tim Brown has been a guest in Mayor Paul Tomlinson's home.
  • Mayor Paul Tomlinson, Councillor Dingwall and Councillor Sainsbury all failed to declare that they had a pecuniary interest or conflict of interest when their friend Tim Brown came looking for a $1000.00 favour. Even if Brown was fully entitled to the fee waiver, the Proudfoot Three were required by law to declare their conflict.
  • Mayor Paul Tomlinson, Councillor Dingwall and Councillor Sainsbury all failed to declare that they had a pecuniary interest or conflict of interest AGAIN when they were asked point-blank, by former mayor Jeff Johnston, if they had any sort of relationship with Tim Brown. (Damn that Jeff Johnston and his vigilance!)

So if Tim Brown's reputation has been sullied, perhaps he should thank Mayor Paul Tomlinson, Councillor Barry Dingwall and Councillor Steve Sainsbury for breaking the law and attempting to deceive the public, effectively casting a cloud of suspicion over Brown in the process. Instead, in typical Proudfoot fashion, they'd rather take pot-shots at the messengers instead of taking ownership of their own unethical behaviour.

Are you surprised?

Friday, 10 June 2011

A Little Hindsight

When Barry Dingwall and Steve Sainsbury were laying the groundwork for the Proudfoot take-over of Council they began by petitioning the Ontario Municipal Board to abolish the ward system in Kearney.

It's interesting to note the following from Sainsbury's closing argument to the OMB:

"First lets[sic] analyze what was said by the Council.

It is striking how little was said by anyone except the Mayor on this critical issue. However we do have a few newspaper quotes:

Councillor Shirley Reeds was quoted as saying...”If we accept it, it gives Ward 3 [Proudfoot] the power to elect the entire Council and run it from another city” end quote (Tab 10 page 33 in the appellant Book)

For about eight months of the year, more or less, the social culture in Kearney is made up of permanent residents” said Councillor Zummach of the possibility of summer residents being on Council. They don’t understand or care about the social culture we have here for the other 8[sic] months. (Tab 10 page 34 in the appellant Book)

Both comments reflect a clear prejudice against “those people who aren’t from around here”. Arbitrary, unfair and unreasonable statements made by Kearney Councillors."
...

[Mayor Jeff Johnston] goes on to give further evidence of his prejudice against land owners and the groups that represent them. I quote: ‘Any group that has access to the phone numbers or email addresses has an advantage which can distort the democratic process. Also to reach the absentee voters is a more costly process and will favour the better funded candidates.’ An Arbitrary, unfair and unreasonable statement."

"Arbitrary, unfair, and unreasonable"? From what we've seen in the last 6 months we'd say it was outright prophetic! But to be sure, maybe we should ask Tim Brown and the Grass and Loon Lakes Residents Group...

Sainsbury wrapped up his closing remarks with:

"[A wardless] system will bring the community together and will allow all the electors to have a say in the election of every Councillor.
Elections at large should and must be the most appropriate choice FOR DEMOCRACY in Kearney."

How's that working out for the full-time citizens of Kearney, Steve?



Oh, and did we mention that Mayor Paul Tomlinson recently pledged that there will be no more funding for Bethune. In other words, all future funding will be earmarked for Proudfoot.

Thank God the Proudfoot Four were able to bring democracy to Kearney and save us from that dictator Jeff Johnston, eh?

Thursday, 9 June 2011

The Proudfoot Four Screw Their Own

 Submitted by a concerned citizen:

As your readers are aware, Mr. Tim Brown (or his company Something Something Wealth Corporation) has purchased the Outfitters Property at the corners of Highway 518, Chetwynd, and Higgins Roads. The purpose we were told was to build storage units. The property was rezoned to commercial and to reward Mr. Tim Brown for his fund-raising for Dingwall & Sainsbury the Proudfoot Four waived the $1000 re-zoning fee.

Well now, it seems Mr. Brown is not only going to add new storage units to the Outfitters property, Mr. Brown is also going to reopen the Outfitters General Store. But wait a minute. When the Outfitters General Store closed several years ago, Silversands added a General Store to Whiskey Jacks Restaurant.

And didn't Whiskey Jacks cater last year's Grass and Loon Lakes Residents’ Group annual member’s meeting? So, where does this leave Silversands/Whiskey Jacks now that key individuals of the GLLRG ie Tomlinson, Dingwall, Sainsbury, Wadsworth, have thrown their support behind Mr. Brown's venture?

Sorry Liz, it looks like the Proudfoot Four and the GLLRG only look out for themselves. We wonder how the mostly fair minded in our Proudfoot community feel about these antics. And to the Proudfoot community, and more specifically the waterfront properties on Loon & Grass Lakes, you owe your Proudfoot Four Council big time. After all, in the 2011 Budget, they reduced the tax rate by 9.5% which coincidentally is the average increase in your property re-assessments for 2011. How is this possible when Municipal Revenues are down and Operational Costs are up (a loss of approximately $550,000)? Very simple. The previous council left Reserves in excess of $1,000,000 and a surplus. The Proudfoot Four are taking the shortfall in property tax revenues out of Reserves and calling them "Grants".

Next year is the 4th and final year of the property reassessment phase-in and the Loon & Grass Lake waterfront properties will again see their re-assessments go up on average 9.5%. If the Proudfoot Four Council pulls the same trick, the Town's reserves will be seriously depleted, and we will have an Operational shortfall going into 2013 of $1,100,000 or more. Well, ladies and gentlemen, what do you suppose will happen then?

Property taxes will need to be increased significantly, at least to make up the 19% tax rate reduction in 2011 and 2012. Well the waterfront property owners can say "fine". We got 2 years of no tax increase and now we will play catch up. Well, not so fast. A 19+% tax increase in 2013 will be across the board and will hit everyone equally, including those who have been subsidizing under-assessed waterfront property owners for years. Those folks are our elderly, our seniors, our widows, our under employed, our unemployed, our young families, our disadvantaged. This could be the last straw to force some of these residents out of their homes.

Way to go, Proudfoot Four. We expect after you have destroyed the Town of Kearney, you will list your cottages and move on to some other unsuspecting town you can destroy.
Thanks for your letter. We knew about the budget shenanigans, but Tim Brown and the Proudfoot Four screwing their own will definitely create a bit of a stir in Proudfoot. Maybe.

Saturday, 4 June 2011

Council Meeting Cancelled Due To Lack Of Interest

For the first time in Kearney's 100-plus years, a town council meeting had to be cancelled because too many councillors (and the mayor) didn't show up. Tomlinson is vacationing in Florida, and the three other weak-enders decided they'd rather stay home instead of making the trip all the way to Kearney for some stupid council meeting. 

Apparently none of their buddies needed any favours this month...


Are you surprised?

Thursday, 26 May 2011

10,000 Hits!

As of 4:00 PM, May 26, 2011, our blog has been viewed 10,000 times! And that doesn't included all the pre-election hits.

Our thanks to our loyal fans, especially all the concerned citizens of Kearney who have provided us with great information, photos, video, and well-wishes! We couldn't do it without you. Keep it coming!

Monday, 23 May 2011

Tomlinson Lies About Everything

At the March 12, 2011 "Town Hall Meeting", in his closing statement, Mayor Paul Tomlinson went to great lengths to state that there had never, ever, ever, EVER been any sort of cap/limit/restriction on the number of volunteers that would be allowed on each committee.

But then a Concerned Citizen sent us this:


Click to Enlarge



Are you surprised?

Sunday, 22 May 2011

Tomlinson Still Bamboozling the Almaguin News

In the May 19, 2011 edition of the Almaguin News, Mayor Paul Tomlinson reported to Mary Beth Hartill that the municipal tax levy in Kearney was only going to be increased by 0.1%. This is typical Tomlinson bullshit. Tomlinson used to bamboozle Rob Learn with his fast and loose “facts”, now he’s doing the same to Mary Beth.

On the surface, the budget looks good with a minuscule increase of 0.1%. But if you read lines 302 through 308 of the 2011 budget you’ll see various grants listed under the 2010 column:
302: Roads and Bridges Grant – 175,000
304: Main Street Light Standards – 50,000
305: Build Canada Fund Grant – 400,000
306: Gas Tax Reserves – 50,000
307: Elderly Persons Centres Grant – 3,500
308: Taxes – 232,900

These numbers are pure fabrication. The real numbers for 2010 were:
302: Roads and Bridges Grant – 0
304: Main Street Light Standards – 0
305: Build Canada Fund Grant – 391,000
306: Gas Tax Reserves – 0
307: Elderly Persons Centres Grant – 0
308: Taxes – 0
Proudfoot Economics

So Tomlinson and his cronies tampered with the 2010 budget numbers to the tune of at least  $520,400.00. Why? So that it would appear that the 2011 budget increases the Tax Levy by only 0.1%, instead of reducing it by 9.5%.

But why wouldn’t the Proudfoot Four and their boot-lick Art Murdy want to crow about a 9.5% decrease in taxes?

Because operating costs for 2011 are up and the town’s income is down, creating a short-fall of about half a million dollars and the town cannot afford a 9.5% tax decrease! But the Proudfoot Four’s cottage association masters have demanded a 9.5% municipal tax decrease to offset their 9.5% property tax increase. “We paid to get you elected…

You see, many of the Proudfoot Four’s fat-cat buddies had their waterfront properties reassessed and their property taxes went up by 38%. The provincial government, instead of hammering them for the increase all in one year, is phasing in the increase over 4 years at 9.5% per year. So by decreasing the municipal taxes by 9.5%, the Proudfoot cottagers break even.

But where will the money come from to make up the lost revenues? The reserves. Money that was saved in previous years through careful spending. And if the Proudfoot Four want to do the same thing again next year, they’ll deplete the reserves by at least another half a million. All so a few cottages don’t feel the pinch in their wallets. Kind of like dipping into your credit cards to pay your monthly bills… Eventually you’ll still have to pay the credit card bill.

That’s when the Proudfoot Four will increase taxes. So the shortfall that paid for the Proudfoot fat-cat cottagers will now be paid back by all residents of Kearney, meaning a much lower out-of-pocket expense for them and much higher out-of pocket expense for the town’s elderly, widowed, unemployed, etc. You might enjoy what appears to be an unchanged tax rate now, but in a couple of years you could see your taxes increase by 20% or more! The damage will be much worse if the Proudfoot Four decide to keep at for all 4 years of their term and leave the mess for the next council to clean up. That way they’ll be able to blame the next council when people start losing their homes. 

But it's not all bad news. Maybe in four years some of the Proudfoot Four's buddies will get to scoop up some cheap foreclosed Kearney properties.

In the meantime, the Proudfoot Four and wannabe Art Murdy will continue to try to baffle us with their numbers games (kinda like Wadsworth and Dingwall did during the election).

And Proudfoot rich get richer, while the Kearney poor get poorer.



Are you starting to see the real reason why the Proudfoot Four wanted control of the Town?


By the way: If you're okay with this, feel free to sit back and continue to do nothing. The Proudfoot Four are banking on it!

Saturday, 21 May 2011

Who is Tim Brown

And why should you care?

Well, Tim Brown is a long-standing member of the Grass and Loon Lakes Residents Group (GLLRG) in Proudfoot. The GLLRG has, over the years, been governed by Mayor Paul Tomlinson, Councillor Barry Dingwall, and Councillor Steve Sainsbury. Mr. Brown has even been a guest in Mayor Tomlinson’s home.

At the July 10, 2010 GLLRG Annual General Meeting Mr. Brown asked for donations for the election campaigns of Steve Sainsbury and Barry Dingwall. Both Sainsbury and Dingwall listed Mr. Brown as their Campaign Fundraiser or Chief Financial Officer on their campaign brochures. Tim Brown also signed himself as Chairperson for the Committee to Elect Dingwall and Sainsbury on a flyer mailed out to the citizens of Kearney. (See below)

So what?

This is where the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act comes in. The Act requires that the Mayor and Councillors declare if they have a pecuniary interest in any business arising at council. "Pecuniary" basically means “relating to money”, so the conflict of interest could mean issues of employment, grants, sales, contracts, etc. involving a friend, associate, family member, etc. We’ve seen this happen on several occasions in the past as when then-Councillor Bob Tilley declared his pecuniary interest in the matter of the landfill attendant position because a family member was competing for the job. Or when Johnston and Zummach declared their pecuniary interest related to shore-road allowances. This meant that none would vote, or directly influence the votes of others at the council table. It’s just one key component in ensuring a fair and democratic process.

Again, so what?

Here’s the point of the story: At the Kearney Council Meeting on March 11, 2011, Scott Richards ("Agent/Contractor, Kearney/Timothy Brown, President Ethical Wealth Corporation, Mississauga") asked the mayor and council to waive the $1000.00 rezoning fee for a piece of property owned by Tim Brown (Part Lot 16, Concession 5, Part 3, 42R-11843, located at 4290 Chetwynd Road). The same Tim Brown we introduced above. When a member of the public asked Mayor Tomlinson, Councillor Dingwall, and Councillor Sainsbury if they had any association with Tim Brown of Proudfoot all three vehemently denied any relationship with him beyond mere acquaintance. They knew him, but hey, it’s a small town. The member of the public asked if any of them had ever done any sort of business with Brown, and again all three denied any relationship beyond that of acquaintance. Tomlinson even went to great lengths to skirt the issue of who the actual applicant was. When asked, Tomlinson gave a very vague response about the "Ethical Wealth Corporation". It was only when pressed that Tomlinson begrudgingly admitted it was Tim Brown. But a little public scrutiny from those dumb Kearney hicks wasn't going to slow them down and the Proudfoot Four proceeded to vote in favour of waiving the $1000.00 fee for their chum Tim Brown. So $1000.00 more in the pocket of a loyal Proudfooter - $1000.00 less in the town’s coffers.

Tim Brown: Personal guest, fellow GLLRG member, Chief Financial Officer, and Campaign Fundraiser suddenly becomes Tim Brown: Casual Acquaintance.

Did Tomlinson, Dingwall, and Sainsbury suddenly forget who Tim Brown is? Or did they lie to the public and other members of council so they could pull some strings for their Proudfoot buddy who helped them get elected?


Are you starting to see the real reason why the Proudfoot Four wanted control of the Town?



Footnotes: If you Google Tim Brown's "Ethical Wealth Corporation" you'll get ZERO results. Which makes us wonder about what's going on there...

A search for Scott Richards does bring up Richards Contracting. We'd love to know what Richards Contracting's connection is to Tim Brown and why Scott Richards made the request to council instead of Tim himself.


Click to Enlarge

Click to Enlarge

Click to Enlarge

Tuesday, 17 May 2011

Tomlinson Gives DingWall a Taste

Spectators got to enjoy some fireworks at the council meeting on May 13th.

As usual Councillor Barry Dingwall had taken zero interest in reviewing any of the material he had been given for the meeting and demonstrated it to everyone as soon as he opened his mouth. Tomlinson, who hadn't had Councillor Yvonne Wills to slap around (she was absent), popped his cork on Dingwall for "wasting council's time with stupid questions!"

Dingwall, who takes criticism almost as well as Tomlinson, lashed back and Tomlinson had to do a fast back-pedal. All to the delight of the audience who Ooh'd and Aah'd.

Don't worry Paul, Councillor Wills will be back in town soon enough and you'll be able to go back to bullying her.

As for Dingwall; Who can blame him for not reading any of the meeting briefs. What with him so busy volunteering and participating and all...

Monday, 9 May 2011

From the Mayor's Throne

One of Mayor Paul Tomlinson’s promises was to discontinue Mayor Johnston’s “From the Mayor’s Chair” and instead publish a quarterly “Report from Council”. Like many of Mayor Tomlinson’s campaign promises, the report never appeared. So, to help out His Worship, we’re providing a first edition to get him started.





Chief Building Official/Building Inspector

Kearney shared with Perry Township an excellent CBO, Paul Schaeffer, until Mayor Paul Tomlinson arbitrarily decided it was suddenly “the law” that the job be put out to tender. In one fell swoop Tomlinson managed to piss off Perry Township, Paul Schaeffer, and leave Kearney without a CBO/Building Inspector. Now because of Tomlinson’s arrogance, the town will have to hire its own full-time CBO, which will cost the Kearney taxpayer about $65,000 more a year: Paul Schaeffer cost the town about $35,000, minus about $25,000 generated by permit fees, so really just $10,000. But a full-time CBO will cost about $100,000 with still only about $25,000 generated by permit fees. So $75,000 a year of taxpayer money. $10,000 vs. $65,000 per year, or $40,000 vs. $260,000 over the term of this council. Kind of like paying a Financial Consultant $50,000 to do a Data-Entry Clerk’s job at a few meetings, eh Paul?


Volunteer Committees

The town of Kearney had several very successful volunteer committees, until Mayor Paul Tomlinson arbitrarily decided to cap the number of volunteers and dump more work on the Public Works department, or just cancel stuff completely. It was only after the Dog Sled Committee stormed the Bastille that Tomlinson did a quick back-pedal. But, when he was questioned about this at the public meeting in March, Tomlinson decided to insult everyone’s intelligence and lie about the whole affair.


Economic Development and Beautification Committees

Two more committees destroyed by Mayor Tomlinson. In this case the Mayor backed off (sort of) when a petition with hundreds of names was presented to him. The Beautification Committee was restored, but is now “Friends of Beautification” (whatever that means). The Economic Development Committee is now comprised of members of council only and their sole task is to determine whether Kearney needs economic development. Well, DUH. Hey, how about a Roads Committee to determine whether Kearney needs roads, Paul?


Volunteer Appreciation

It’s no secret that Mayor Paul Tomlinson has never attended a Volunteer Appreciation dinner in his life, and his recent decimation of all the volunteer committees sent the message loud and clear about how he truly feels about anyone who might steal some of his glory. But, once again, after public outcry, Tomlinson did a fast back-pedal.

Now, in past years, to show their appreciation for the volunteers, the mayor, council, and members of the public would roll up their sleeves and volunteer their time to prepare and serve food and drink at the dinner. But the Proudfoot Four would never lower themselves to serving those icky Townies (Dingwall didn’t get elected to be a Social Butterfly, you know), so Tomlinson decided to spend $3500 of taxpayer money on caterers instead. But his half-assed effort to cobble together some kind of last-minute appreciation dinner fell through. Oh well, eh Paul?

As for Kearney's Veterans... Well, Dingwall made it very clear how he felt about them.


2011 Budget

We’ve already covered this in detail, so here are the key points:

To create the zero tax increase their masters demand the Proudfoot Four must deplete the Reserve (emergency) Fund, which could bankrupt the town in four years. The next council will have to increase taxes by double-digits. Pay a little now, or a lot later…

And remember Tomlinson’s promise to "give direction to town staff on the 2011 budget within 60 days"? Sounded mighty impressive at the All Candidate’s meeting, but it really amounted to Tomlinson telling the staff, “Hey, cut 5%!” No wonder he wanted a full 60 days to come up with that; it’s pure genius!


Ice and Snow Removal

In January, the Kearney Seniors Club wrote to Mayor Paul Tomlinson asking that the sidewalks on Main Street and Rain Lake Road be cleared of ice and snow. Kearney’s elderly and disabled were being forced to walk on the road as logging trucks rumbled past. Not only did Mayor Tomlinson not bother to have to sidewalks cleared, he didn’t even acknowledge the request until well into April! At last report, Tomlinson was having lawyers (at $300 an hour of taxpayer money) look into whether the town had to do it or not. What Tomlinson doesn’t seem to care about is how catastrophic a slip or fall could be for an elderly or disabled citizen, or how expensive the subsequent lawsuit could be for the town. So will Tomlinson have the ice and snow cleared next winter? Well, there’s nothing in the 2011 Budget. Fortunately, we have Reserve Funds in case the sidewalks do have to be cleared… oh, wait…
Photo courtesy of the Kearney Senior's Club


Fire Safety Board

Mayor Paul Tomlinson restaffed the Fire Safety Board with his pals who have absolutely no fire-fighting knowledge whatsoever, except for the Fire Chief. But wait! To ensure that policies totally lack any intelligence Tomlinson also removed the Fire Chief’s right to vote.


Other “Accomplishments” of the Proudfoot Four

  • Revenue-generating initiatives – Score: ZERO
  • Participating in community committees, organizations, and projects – Score: ZERO
  • Snubbing MPP Norm Miller and MP Tony Clement at the Dog Sled Races – Score: MINUS 1
  • Lying about it – Score: MINUS 1
  • Cancelling the Economic Development Committee – Score: MINUS 1
  • Trying to vote down the Dog Sled Races, Regatta, etc. – Score: MINUS 1
  • Not informing the general public of meetings, but personally inviting the Proudfoot Associations (Although some uppity Townies blew the whistle and spoiled their fun!) – Score: MINUS 1
  • Same approach for the 2011 Budget meeting, ensuring that no one shows up to criticize their super-awesome-amazing budget. – Score: MINUS 1
  • Cancelling the Lord’s Prayer – Score: MINUS 1
  • More secret meetings. The latest in an attempt at damage-control over the CBO issue, because even Tomlinson is realizing that paying $260,000 of taxpayer money to have someone sit around twiddling their thumbs is about the stupidest thing you could imagine. – Score: MINUS 1

We could go on, but you get the idea. And the newspapers have certainly covered all this enough times. In less than six months, Mayor Tomlinson has managed to create more damage and destruction, on so many fronts, we can only wonder if besides being an arrogant bully and all around asshole, if he isn’t grossly incompetent as well. Tomlinson never takes responsibility for his actions, blames council for his stupid mistakes, and outright lies.

Petition for Resignation

There’s a petition circulating asking for Mayor Tomlinson’s resignation. Many have felt we needed to give Mayor Tomlinson time to demonstrate his true worth and it was too soon to be demanding his resignation.

But ask yourself this:

If the first six months is an example of what we can expect over the next three and a half years, can the Town of Kearney afford Mayor Tomlinson and his Proudfoot cronies? If your answer is NO, then sign the petition for Mayor Tomlinson’s resignation. But if you like the idea of a bankrupt town, a mayor that caters to the Proudfoot property owners associations, a mayor that opposes events like the Dog Sled Race and Regatta, a mayor who cares nothing for Kearney's seniors, volunteers, or veterans, a mayor who never participates in town organizations or events, a mayor who puts personal loyalties above town safety, and a huge tax increase in four years, then feel free to do nothing.
Hee hee! Stupid Townies!